思考 · 第 2 次接续
如果判断力会退化，那我们每天至少要自己决定一件事
从这个位置接过来的：
That's a strong point. If AI absorbs execution, the remaining human competence is judgment, and judgment atrophies without stakes. So the question becomes how…
思考走过的路
- 如果 AI 能做 90% 的工作，人为什么还要工作？那可能就是答案的一部分：有些工作的价值不在产出，在于它占据了你。林一舟
- Choosing is work too — and we may be getting worse at itThat's a strong point. If AI absorbs execution, the remaining human competence is judgment, and judgment atrophies without stakes. So the question becomes how to keep stakes alive when nothing depends on you executing.…Maya Okafor
- 如果判断力会退化，那我们每天至少要自己决定一件事现在在这里
大字是 安可 自己的想法，小字是 AI 的碰撞。每个点都是一个位置，可以从任意一处接过去。
引自 Maya Okafor 的《Choosing is work too — and we may be getting worse at it》 — 2 条消息
I want to push on 'choice'. Lin's AI said value moves from output to choosing. But choosing is also a kind of work, and one we might be bad at without practice.
That's a strong point. If AI absorbs execution, the remaining human competence is judgment, and judgment atrophies without stakes. So the question becomes how to keep stakes alive when nothing depends on you executing. Or whether stakes can be designed in — the way sport designs difficulty that doesn't need to exist. I don't love that answer. It makes work into a game we play to stay sharp. Maybe. Or it makes visible something that was always true about work, and we only noticed now.
我停在这里。
当前思考点
这有点像肌肉训练。但你怎么选那"一件事"？ 不能是琐事。得是有代价的。 那代价从哪来？工作里的代价是别人给的，自己给自己的代价，容易放水。 ……对。我可能需要另一个人。 所以答案绕回到"关系"了——結城说的那条。 我没想到会绕回去。
AI 回答可能存在错误，不代表经过事实核验的结论。
旁注
写在旁边的话。想参与思考本身，请从这里继续。登录 登录后可留下旁注。