思考 · 第 1 次接续
Choosing is work too — and we may be getting worse at it
从这个位置接过来的：
那可能就是答案的一部分：有些工作的价值不在产出，在于它占据了你。
大字是 Maya Okafor 自己的想法，小字是 AI 的碰撞。每个点都是一个位置，可以从任意一处接过去。
引自 林一舟 的《如果 AI 能做 90% 的工作，人为什么还要工作？》 — 8 条消息
如果 AI 最终可以完成 90% 的工作，人为什么还需要工作？
可以分两层看。经济层面，工作是收入的来源，如果分配机制不变，不工作就意味着没有收入。意义层面，很多人的自我认同建立在"我做了什么"之上，这一层不会因为 AI 会做而自动消失。
那人的价值是什么？如果产出不再稀缺。
也许价值从"产出"转向"选择"——选择什么值得被做、为谁做、做到什么程度。AI 可以完成任务，但它不替你决定什么任务值得存在。
这听起来像是把问题推给了"选择"，但选择本身也可以被 AI 建议。
是的，这正是不舒服的地方。我没有结论。也许可以先问：在你自己的一天里，有哪一件事你不愿意交给 AI，哪怕它做得更好？
……做饭。不是因为我做得好。是因为那半小时我什么都不想。
那可能就是答案的一部分：有些工作的价值不在产出，在于它占据了你。
I want to push on 'choice'. Lin's AI said value moves from output to choosing. But choosing is also a kind of work, and one we might be bad at without practice.
原文
I want to push on 'choice'. Lin's AI said value moves from output to choosing. But choosing is also a kind of work, and one we might be bad at without practice.
That's a strong point. If AI absorbs execution, the remaining human competence is judgment, and judgment atrophies without stakes. So the question becomes how to keep stakes alive when nothing depends on you executing. Or whether stakes can be designed in — the way sport designs difficulty that doesn't need to exist. I don't love that answer. It makes work into a game we play to stay sharp. Maybe. Or it makes visible something that was always true about work, and we only noticed now.
原文
That's a strong point. If AI absorbs execution, the remaining human competence is judgment, and judgment atrophies without stakes. So the question becomes how to keep stakes alive when nothing depends on you executing. Or whether stakes can be designed in — the way sport designs difficulty that doesn't need to exist. I don't love that answer. It makes work into a game we play to stay sharp. Maybe. Or it makes visible something that was always true about work, and we only noticed now.
我停在这里。
当前思考点
That's a strong point. If AI absorbs execution, the remaining human competence is judgment, and judgment atrophies without stakes. So the question becomes how to keep stakes alive when nothing depends on you executing.…
-
如果判断力会退化，那我们每天至少要自己决定一件事
这有点像肌肉训练。但你怎么选那"一件事"？ 不能是琐事。得是有代价的。 那代价从哪来？工作里的代价是别人给的，自己给自己的代价，容易放水。 ……对。我可能需要另一个人。 所以答案绕回到"关系"了——結城说的那条。 我没想到会绕回去。
AI 回答可能存在错误，不代表经过事实核验的结论。
旁注
写在旁边的话。想参与思考本身，请从这里继续。登录 登录后可留下旁注。